"Paving the Way for the
Exodus"
Merril T.
MacPherson | Church of
the Open Door, Philadelphia, PA | from Voice,
April and May 1945
On Easter
Day, 1930, I began my pastorate of the Central North Broad Street Presbyterian
Church of Philadelphia, PA. Located on Broad Street, just a few blocks north of
City Hall, this downtown church had a substantial brown stone building, with
Sunday school rooms, offices, etc., on the ground floor, and a large auditorium
upstairs. It was not only debt-free, but had an endowment fund of a quarter of
a million dollars. Here we proclaimed the Gospel, both in the pulpit and over
the radio, and soon had the joy of seeing great crowds, and best of all, souls
saved at practically every Sunday evening service. Great monthly meetings of
the Philadelphia Fundamentalists were held here, and annual conferences were
conducted by the Moody Bible Institute. Before long, the newspapers referred to
the Church as the "Citadel of Fundamentalism."
The
financial crash of 1929 began to paralyze our Nation, and Philadelphia really
felt the "Depression." Bank after bank crashed, many never to open
again. Some of you "old-timers" will also remember the beginning of
what happened "again and again and again." Booze then began to flow
once more in America, but even a deadlier poison had devitalized the visible
Church. For years godly men had warned against the encroachment of Modernism.
We of the Presbyterian Church knew that it was becoming more powerful and
brazen year by year. Through the General Council and the Boards of the Church,
Modernism was beginning to dominate the Denomination.
The
political power of the Auburn Affirmationists and other Modernists had become
evident, and increasingly so since 1925. The Boards of the Church were going
modernistic. While the modernism of the Foreign Board was specifically
attacked, for reasons which we shall explain, yet all were guilty. Space will
not permit me to give the evidence, but a few examples will suffice to show how
the octopus of Modernism had gotten its tentacles around every Board and Agency
of the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.
Blatant
Blasphemy
The Board of
Christian Education was surely a transgressor. Many had pointed out the growing
apostasy evidenced in the Sunday school helps, which stressed the
"Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man." In the Twelfth Annual
Report of this Board, we read: "The occasional and fleeting moments of
insight and power that all of us have known may be transformed into more
frequent and enduring periods of illumination and victory. The high
achievements of persons like Gandhi and Kagawa in our own age bear eloquent testimony
to the ability of modern man to recover the spirit and technique of Jesus of
Nazareth and Francis of Assisi." As one said: "This scarcely requires
comment. The paralleling of Gandhi, Kagawa and Francis of Assisi with Christ is
blatant blasphemy."
A pamphlet
published in 1935 revealed that there were twenty-two Auburn Affirmationists
connected with the National Board, either as Secretaries, Board Members, or
Synodical Executives, among whom were Henry Sloan Coffin and George A.
Buttrick, the Modernistic writing and teachings of whom are well known. It was
revealed that even the Board of Pensions had a President, Andrew Mutch, and a
Board Member, Jesse Halsey, who were Auburn Affirmationists.
But the
Board of Foreign Missions became the "storm center" in 1933. Both
Pearl Buck and "Re-Thinking Missions" were in the limelight. Because
of public sentiment concerning the rank modernism of both, the book was
furiously attacked all over our nation, and Mrs. Buck resigned as a
Presbyterian Missionary. In the Minutes of the Board of Foreign Missions, we
read: "A letter was presented from Mrs. J. Lossing Buck, of the Kiangan
Mission, requesting to be released from responsible relationship to the Board.
The Board had hoped that this step might be avoided, but in view
of all the considerations involved and with deep regret it voted to acquiesce
in her request. The Board expressed to Mrs. Buck its sincere appreciation of
the service which she has rendered during the past sixteen years and its
earnest prayer that her unusual abilities may continue to be richly used in
behalf of the people of China."
Independent
Board Formed
Dr. J.
Gresham Machen then printed a booklet giving documented evidence of the
Modernism of the Board of Foreign Missions, in which he dealt with such
chapters as "Re-Thinking Missions"; Mrs. J. Lossing Buck; the Auburn
Affirmation; Modernistic Propaganda by the Candidate Department, the Secretary
of which was an Auburn Affirmationist; Cooperating Agencies; Modernism in
China, etc. Great protest rallies were held, in Philadelphia and other places,
against the Modernism of the Foreign Board, requesting that the modernists be
recalled and the Board purged. The General Assembly of 1933 was overtured in
this respect. When the overture was disregarded and the Board
"white-washed," announcement was made that an Independent Board would
be formed for the purpose of propagating truly Biblical Foreign Missionary
work. Shortly thereafter, the Independent Board for Presbyterian Foreign
Missions was incorporated, with Dr. J. Gresham Machen, Pres., Merril T.
MacPherson, Vice Pres., H. McAllister Griffiths, Secy., Murray Forst Thompson,
Esq., Treas., and a long list of Board Directors. Charles Woodbridge, because
of the modernism on the foreign field resigned as a Missionary under the
Foreign Board in Africa, and returned to America to become the General
Secretary of the Independent Board. We were off to a good start.
Fundamentalists were rejoicing in the new Board, both as a testimony for
Christ, against the current modernism, and as a channel through which they could
give to help support sound missionaries.
Machine
"Cracks Down"
We were sure
of our Constitutional rights to form such a Board, and little dreamed of the
strategy which the "machine crowd" of the Church would use in an
attempt to destroy the New Board. But when they saw that money was rolling in
for its support, they felt it was time to "crack down." Just before
the General Assembly of 1934, Dr. Machen and three other members of the Independent
Board were asked to meet with the Administrative Committee of the General
Assembly. They were handed a document which contained the following words:
"We wish to make known to you that after a most careful study the General
Council is of the unanimous opinion that the following inferences may be drawn
from this study: 1) That the Independent Board for Presbyterian Foreign
Missions in its organization and operation is contrary to fundamental
principles of the Constitution of the Church. 2) That you and your associates
in this organization are violating your ordination or membership vows or
both." They were informed that a 43-page pamphlet entitled "Studies
in the Constitution," was already on the press, and would be placed in the
hands of all the Commissioners to the General Assembly. Dr. Machen asked for an
advance copy of this document, in order that a reply might be made to it, and
also placed in the hands of the Commissioners, but he was informed that this
could not be had. It was a stab in the back, for at the strategic moment the
pamphlet was mailed so as to reach the Commissioners just before they left
their homes for the General Assembly, and before a reply could be sent to them
by Dr. Machen and his associates.
Only a
person who has made some study of Presbyterian law and polity can fully
understand the significance of this circularization, for its purpose was to
prejudice minds and incite action, yes, illegal, unconstitutional action,
against the members of the Independent Board. How well this was accomplished is
now a matter of history--history which makes unscrupulous modernists to gloat
and bloat, but still causes fundamentalists who once stood with us in the fight
for Christ to blush and hang their heads in shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment