![]() |
14 April 1968 | Cincinnati Enquirer |
Showing posts with label Easter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Easter. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 11, 2020
Thursday, December 5, 2019
A Living Hope
30
March 1929 | Cincinnati Enquirer
A
Living Hope by Dr. Jesse Halsey, Minister of the Seventh Presbyterian Church
God and Father—Our Lord Jesus Christ—A Living Hope—The
Resurrection—An
Inheritance Incorruptible—I. Peter 1:3-4
Easter comes with its message of Hope and Courage; like all
deep things it begins in mystery. We don’t pretend to understand all that
happened on the first Easter Day nineteen centuries ago, but we believe that
the Lord Jesus showed Himself alive to his friends, and that in their new-found
faith they went out to transform the world. Faith in God leads one to expect the great and mysterious. We live in
no simple world; mystery—the mystery of life and death—surrounds us. We reach
out beyond the things we see.
I believe first of all because I want to believe. One, at
times, may argue the question of immortality and consider the case unproven,
but let some one of his own flesh and blood pass within the veil and reason
surrenders the place to love, so that many a hard man has set his face toward
God in hope of one day seeing a little head on which the sun is ever shining.
Napoleon said that the heart was a place in the body where two large veins met,
and that a statesman needed to have his heart in his head. The same ideal
possesses the formal philosopher. It is only when one says with Tennyson, “I
have felt,” that he will experience the strong urge of the unseen world. “I
can’t and I won’t disbelieve.”
This does not mean that our hopes are unreasoned and are but
a fond imagination. There are good and sufficient reasons for believing, but
first comes the attitude of mind and heart that is positive, constructive, and
desirous.
We are citizens of two worlds. One is material and tangible,
like water; the other is spiritual, unseen, intangible, like air. But the
latter is no less real than the former. Our bodies are of the earth earthy, but
we are spirit, living in a transitory earthly tenement. Some day we will slip
off this “body of humiliation,” but the eternal spirit will take its way to
God, who is the Author of life and our Eternal Home.
It is not selfishness that makes us want to live on, but a
stern conviction that the best that the universe knows is that spiritual
reality, which we vaguely call personality. The faith and hope and love that we
have experienced in life—our friendships, all convince us of the value of
persons. If anything in the universe has permanence, it ought to be these
supreme values. Such values we enthrone at the heart of things in God.
And in Jesus Christ we have seen all lovely qualities
incarnate. His life—so beautiful, so strong—we call divine. Is it reasonable to
think that reality like this goes out in death? Can a few nails and a Roman
spear end such a life? If death could destroy Jesus Christ I find my essential
faith destroyed—faith in the reality of all human values; faith in God; faith
in reason; faith in an ordered universe. Then the materialist is
right—biochemistry explains everything in the realm of human life and faith and
love and hope mean nothing!
So while we keep the feast
of the Savior’s Immortality we pause in grateful remembrance of all the pure
and beautiful souls who have walked with us in strength and gentleness and
love. We are strengthened in the assurance that what was bound up with our life
and made a dear part of our being cannot be lost; that they and we are safe in
the hands of God our Father, who brought Jesus Christ through the experience of
death into a new life which those who follow Him may share. God is the God of
this and every world, visible and invisible. Character like Christ’s resides in
Him, and He is pledged by the very nature of His being to honor the supreme
qualities for which the whole creation labors.
Thursday, April 10, 2014
Letter from Francis G. Peabody to Jesse Halsey
Francis Greenwood Peabody was born in Boston on December 4, 1847, to Mary Jane Derby and Ephraim Peabody, a Unitarian minister. After Ephraim Peabody's untimely death in 1856, his former congregation provided the funds for his son's education. Francis graduated from Harvard College (1869) and received degrees from the Divinity School (1872) and from the Graduate School (1872).
After a brief time as chaplain and teacher at Antioch College in Ohio, Peabody served as minister at the First Parish in Cambridge, a Unitarian church. In 1880, Peabody became a lecturer on ethics and homiletics at Harvard Divinity School. He subsequently served as the Parkman Professor of Theology (1881–1886), Preacher to the University (1886–1906), Plummer Professor of Christian Morals (1886–1912), and Dean of the Divinity School (1901–1906).
Although Peabody strongly influenced the religious, moral, and philosophical climate of Harvard as the University Preacher and Plummer Professor, his most enduring achievement was his introduction of the study of social ethics to the Divinity School and Harvard College. Peabody's social ethics courses stressed the need to study the religious and social implications stimulated by industrialization, and he championed social-science methodology, the case study method, and liberal interpretations of the New Testament. In his teaching, preaching, and writing, Peabody characterized Christianity as a religion that required Christians to act as agents of social change, de-emphasizing personal salvation in favor of social action. He also used photography to document social problems and strengthen support for social reform.
Thursday, February 13, 2014
“Going on a trek through Kansas one winter-time . . .”
By Jesse Halsey | c1933
Going on a trek through Kansas one winter-time, visiting
former students, knowing his plebian extraction and agrarian interest a
minister took him to a new model hatchery; batteries of incubators lined the
room which was immaculately white like a hospital operating theatre. Three
times a day incubators produced their broods. Greatly impressed our friend
ordered fifty Plymouth Rocks to be delivered about Easter.
Easter came and with it frigid weather. Nonetheless, the
chicks arrived by parcel post, half frozen, but still alive. The wife set them
on the register and they soon revived and put on their pristine puffiness. I
had prepared a habitation in the basement—hardware cloth for the bottom, a hover
where the chicks could foregather in the heat of a constantly burning hundred-watt
lamp. They began to grow at once, a one hundred pound bag of growing meal secured
from a downtown store standing hard by. No incidents or accidents save one; the
half dozen that fell into the drinking facilities and nearly drowned. Rescued
and put in the kitchen over all but one revived.
Forty-nine out of the fifty lived to maturity.
Unfortunately, instead of being Plymouth Rocks that have some size and would give
some meat, these turned out to be Leghorns, which are raised for their egg
productivity, and not for their avoirdupois. As they were all young roosters we
had no prospects of either eggs or meat. However, we fed them along until
broiler maturity. In the meantime, I had become so attached to them
collectively and individually that I found I could not eat them with any relish.
Summer heat was coming on and there were olfactory reasons for removing the
brood from the basement. In the meager backyard on our alley we devised a hutch
of ample proportions but problems multiplied. With growing lustiness the young
roosters began to crow at sun-up and disturbed the neighbors along with
ourselves. The best wire and lock were no sure safeguard against night
prowlers. Several disappeared in spite of the fact that I kept a light burning
in the yard all night. Obviously the time for their demise was at hand. I could
find no deep freeze nearer than Waukegan so moving them piecemeal to the
cellar, I dispatched them, prepared them for canning, and in a steam cooker the
broilers turned to soup (for several years we had chicken soup). While Campbell’s
could be bought for ten cents a can in those days, when I counted the initial
cost, plus the four bags of feed at $5.00 per, without counting anything for
work and worry, our chicken soup cost about 50 cents a pint.
I don’t doubt but when we retire to our country diggings we
will have some chickens, but they won’t be kept in the cellar and they won’t be
leghorns. And we hope it won’t be war times, which was the excuse for the
experiment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)